Traditional TKR: Proven Longevity
Time-tested approach with 90%+ 20-year survival rates. Surgeon has complete visualization and can adapt intraoperatively. Ideal for complex anatomy, previous surgery, or patient preference for established technique.
Accepting New Patients•Same-Week Appointments Available•Same-Day Appointments for Acute Injuries
Knee Surgery
Explore traditional, minimally invasive, and robotic-assisted total knee replacement techniques. Learn which approach suits your anatomy and recovery goals.
Request an Appointment →90%+
20-year survival rate for traditional TKR
4–6 weeks
Faster return to normal activity with minimally invasive approach
2–3°
Average alignment accuracy improvement with robotic assistance
95%
Patients report good-to-excellent strength at 3 months post-robotic TKR
Time-tested approach with 90%+ 20-year survival rates. Surgeon has complete visualization and can adapt intraoperatively. Ideal for complex anatomy, previous surgery, or patient preference for established technique.
Smaller incision, less muscle disruption, less blood loss. Patients often walk same-day post-op, start therapy immediately, and return to activities 4–6 weeks faster than traditional approach.
Computer guidance and haptic feedback enable surgeon to achieve near-perfect implant alignment. Studies show improved alignment accuracy, reduced outliers, and potentially longer implant lifespan.
Preserves quadriceps muscle by medial parapatellar or subvastus approach. Patients report better leg strength, easier stair climbing, and faster functional recovery within 8–12 weeks.
At your consultation, we review your anatomy (X-ray, imaging), activity goals, and medical history to recommend the surgical option most likely to deliver your desired outcome.
It depends on your anatomy, activity level, age, and medical history. Your surgeon will review your imaging and discuss options. For most patients, any approach yields excellent results; we choose the one optimizing your specific recovery goals.
Robotic implants and setup fees add $2,000–$3,000 but don't significantly increase your insurance co-pay because the procedure code is identical. Some patients choose it for precision; others prefer traditional approach—coverage is the same.
Minimally invasive uses a 3–4 inch incision and preserves more soft tissue, while traditional uses a 5–6 inch incision. Both achieve excellent implant positioning; MI often enables faster therapy and recovery.
Yes. Robotic systems (Mako, NAVIO, others) are FDA-cleared for orthopedic use. Thousands of procedures are performed annually with strong safety and efficacy data.
Absolutely. Surgical approach choice is yours, in consultation with your surgeon. We present the options, explain benefits and trade-offs, and proceed with your preferred approach.
Providers
Board-Certified Knee Replacement Surgeons
Meet the surgeons experienced in all TKR techniques at Elite Orthopedic.
Aftercare
Recovery Timeline & Physical Therapy
Learn what to expect post-surgery across different TKR approaches.
Billing
Understanding TKR Costs
Implant and surgical costs explained; insurance coverage for all approaches.
Schedule your consultation today.
Request an Appointment